Still down for me, guys, I don't know what's happening. The black logo on white background thing worked fine for me just a few hours ago.
Still down for me, guys, I don't know what's happening. The black logo on white background thing worked fine for me just a few hours ago.
Did somebody follow the teasing by Radiohead before their new album ? There were things like this: opacity of an image was decreasing periodically on their website, leading finally to the video of the new song. Will it be the same for NIN ? (I hope not...)
I'm sure that when Europe goes to sleep and it's evening in California a new nin release will be unleashed and I'll be asleep and is awaken to 50 pages of discussion about it and I'm gonna feel left out. Just saying...
Well ... now http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com says the same: "It's not just you! http://www.nin.com looks down from here."
Now it's up again!
"It's just you. http://nin.com is up."
i don't understand. for me nin.com was up all the time.... (??)
It was down for a short time. I guess time to update things "behind"
Yeah, for me it's up again, too. What the hell is going on? Is the logo even smaller now? My mind is going crazy!
And after all that...
On purpose trolling? Or maybe something might still happen 'soon'?
I just can say:
*Hyped
Originally posted by poro765
^man, that gif never gets old.
They decided it's not worth it having a special website anymore. Soon when you click on the logo it will redirect to the band's facebook page.
And that's it! :P
update the website, sure, but teasing by not showing anything is something different. If they wanted to update the website, they would have modified it offline, then turn it on...
I'm sure plenty of bands have done that before radiohead including Trent (someone mentioned a bleedthrough updated nin pixel thing), the same as billy corgan had released a pay what you want album before radiohead. It just annoys me that once they do something it's considered the first time even if it isnt
Aha. Gotcha!
Error 403 in log
Radiohead didn't just merely update their website though; they had pretty much scrubbed their entire social media presence for a few days before putting up the Burn the Witch video. Replacing nin.com with a single logo is close but this isn't really the same thing as what they did.
Usually - scripts replacing.
Right now there's "example domain"
Code:<!doctype html> <html> <head> <title>Example Domain</title> <meta charset="utf-8" /> <meta http-equiv="Content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" /> <style type="text/css"> body { background-color: #f0f0f2; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: "Open Sans", "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; } div { width: 600px; margin: 5em auto; padding: 50px; background-color: #fff; border-radius: 1em; } a:link, a:visited { color: #38488f; text-decoration: none; } @media (max-width: 700px) { body { background-color: #fff; } div { width: auto; margin: 0 auto; border-radius: 0; padding: 1em; } } </style> </head> <body> <div> <h1>Example Domain</h1> <p>This domain is established to be used for illustrative examples in documents. You may use this domain in examples without prior coordination or asking for permission.</p> <p><a href="http://www.iana.org/domains/example">More information...</a></p> </div> </body> </html>
I am not saying that Radiohead were the first, it is the fact of talking about the logo shrinking little by little (not a reference) - even though it turned out it wasn't true - reminded me about the change of opacity on Dead Air Space. Just this.
It's all like it was before now, so nvm