Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 9 10 11
Results 301 to 308 of 308

Thread: The 2024 Election Thread - The Most Important Election of Our Lifetime... Again

  1. #301
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    352
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Wretchedest View Post
    100% delusional. It is not happening. I get that the media is getting a lot of clicks on this subject, but it's absurd. I'd bet my house on it. This is the "Bernie Sanders is going to turn the convention" of 2024. It's absolute nonsense.

    It's also laughably dumb that it's all coming down after one debate. We are going to ignore Biden's policy success and his incumbent advantage, his appeal to the middle, and the the fact he is running against an equally old, convicted felon, who mishandled the entire pandemic. Biden a man who everyone knows simply has a stutter, performs poorly in *one* debate, and we are going to ignore every historical precedent and run a brand new candidate with 4 months to spare? What are you people smoking?
    I'm not saying it's actually going to happen, I'm just saying it should if the Democrats actually want to win. You're welcome to think I'm delusional or laughably dumb all you want, this was not performing poorly in one debate, it was a mask off moment for how nonfunctional Biden actually is. Doesn't matter that Trump is as old or a convicted felon or worse in just about every way, his following is large and dedicated and not going away and we need every vote we can get. Ignoring that Biden is clearly no longer fit for office in the eyes of the vast majority of the public will make us hemorrhage support in November. If you think that can be safely bypassed and that Biden will be carried back into office off the strength of his "policy success" and incumbent advantage and "appeal to the middle" at this point, good luck and godspeed. You can have some of what I've been smoking but I want some of yours, I think it's stronger!

    Quote Originally Posted by Wretchedest View Post
    I would also say it's counterproductive to our success to mire in this impossibility. We are chilling our own voters even further and many of the ideas are also, honestly, fundamentally anti democratic, the notion that we would simply appoint a candidate without a primary election is a really terrifying precedent to set.
    I feel that ignoring what nearly everyone felt about what they saw and just buckling down with what we have until November not only wouldn't be right - it would chill our voters even more. It would just be another way of announcing the Democratic party's contempt for the electorate, a testament to how completely their electoral strategy begins and ends with "you have to vote for us because we're your only option." And I completely understand your misgivings about an open convention appointing a candidate without a primary. It's not something I'd suggest or want them to consider except under circumstances as dire as this. But I truly, genuinely believe that if it's Biden in November, we lose and lose big and I cannot resign myself to that possibility when it's not technically locked in yet.

  2. #302
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Monterey Bay, Ca
    Posts
    3,154
    Mentioned
    61 Post(s)
    I think t would be a huge risk to run another candidate
    I think because of all the election lies people tend to forget: Biden won by a fairly large margin, and Hilary losing certain states like Michigan was something of a blip. I'm in as much a doom spiral as any one else and I'm not in love with Biden or anything but I think he is more broadly popular and Trump is more unpopular than people realize. Trump supporters are so loud, and certainly they're great at controlling the narrative and leading the conversation through sheer stubbornness, and so I think we sometimes lose track of the reality of quiet support.

  3. #303
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    1,793
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    It really comes down to this: what do the independent/undecided voters in swing states think? Do they think they'd vote for Biden after the debate?

    The reason why people are focusing on the debate and not his record (imo) is that optics outweigh accomplishments in this society, sad as it is. People complain about the price of groceries and gas because it's an optical thing. They don't want to hear that gas is actually cheaper than it has been in the past, because they want the gas prices and grocery prices to be 2017 numbers, which is not realistic.

    It's a risk to run Biden. It's a risk to run another candidate.

    I do fear racism and sexism playing a factor in a loss of votes if Harris is the candidate.

  4. #304
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Kansas City, Missouri
    Posts
    3,540
    Mentioned
    73 Post(s)
    All I'm saying, is all the Dems in Washington saying "the public just saw what we all have known for 2.5 years", then WHY. THE. FUCK. did you bet everything on him being THE guy, AGAIN.

    It's a total copout. Biden will not be replaced, it make zero sense, will almost ensure Trump wins even more so. They made their bed with this guy, and now they're gonna have to deal with it. Simple as that. I mean really, what kind of look is it for the party when their guy has ONE bad debate performance and they throw him under the bus immediately. When, not if, WHEN, the democrats lose everything in November, the fucking DNC will be the only ones to blame.

    Just utterly shameful and embarrassing.

  5. #305
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    1,994
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    The person who has total control over an open convention happening or not is Joe Biden. Legally, he has enough delegates bound to him via the primaries to lock up the nomination so there's not a subverting process that exists to remove him from the ticket. It is solely up to him to decide if he is going to continue in this race or not.

    I think that this debate should be happening based on the debate performance and its culmination of our fears and concerns about Joe being the right person to move forward BUT, it is solely up to him to continue in this race or not. If he decides to push forward and that continues through the official nomination process, then we all have to rally behind him because that fuck, Trump, has his Project 2025 asshats ready to end democracy as we know it.

  6. #306
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,185
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    To be honest, I'm approaching this election the same way I did the last election: I'm not voting for Biden, I'm voting against Trump. People can hem and haw about how both are equally as bad, but we've gone almost four years without having a crisis every damn day because of King Dipshit not knowing how to do the job. I don't have to like Biden to know that having Trump back in office would just make things absolutely miserable for everyone.

  7. #307
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,134
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BRoswell View Post
    To be honest, I'm approaching this election the same way I did the last election: I'm not voting for Biden, I'm voting against Trump. People can hem and haw about how both are equally as bad, but we've gone almost four years without having a crisis every damn day because of King Dipshit not knowing how to do the job. I don't have to like Biden to know that having Trump back in office would just make things absolutely miserable for everyone.
    This is fair. Even if Biden is a senile bedridden mess, he's surrounded himself with people competence. Trump has surrounded himself with the worst of the worst.

    There's no competition here.

  8. #308
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Monterey Bay, Ca
    Posts
    3,154
    Mentioned
    61 Post(s)
    Another concern I have here is that in replacing Biden we will end up with another bad candidate. The DNC isn't magically going to become wise in its choosing. Rumors and spitballing have us at Harris or Newsom, whom I both really like, being from California, but the broader public has already been pitted against both of these people and California. We are gonna end up with another bland old dude as a candidate, not some progressive with ideas that can meet this political moment.

Posting Permissions